2-line summary
Not just “pretty slides,” but if…
- you have lots of source materials like files, PDFs, and recordings to build from, and
- you need a presentation that’s substantive and naturally written
then Daglo will be the most productive choice.
Sign up now and see it for yourself! 🙂
Intro
We’ve officially entered the era where AI can create presentation decks and PPTs.
These days, many services can generate everything from design to a presenter script just by entering a topic. Some of the best-known options include the global powerhouse Gamma, the search-focused Genspark, and Daglo, which specializes in understanding and generating Korean documents.
In this post, based on hands-on experience, I’ll compare them across slide quality, naturalness in Korean, and the ability to handle PDFs/audio files.
🧭 1. Overview of each service
Gamma: Gamma
- A leading U.S.-based AI slide generator
- Strong at sleek, web-design-style templates
- Produces the best quality when generating English content (seriously impressive!) 👍
- Downside: With Korean input, the context can break or the phrasing can feel like awkward translation
Genspark: Genspark
- A search (Search)-based AI agent service
- Quickly creates “informational slides” using the latest web information
- Downside: Limited design editing, and closer to summarization than deep document analysis
Daglo: Daglo (⭐ This is the service the author is building)
- An integrated AI workflow for documents, slides, and summaries—optimized for Korean users
- Can analyze and generate slides from PDF papers, reports, and even audio recordings
- Supports multiple models so you can choose the best LLM (e.g., GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, etc.)
- Strength: Exceptionally strong Korean writing quality, and it handles the full flow of “my materials → summary → PPT generation” in one place
🖥️ 2. Input method comparison (text · uploads · web search)
Feature | Gamma | Genspark | Daglo |
Enter a topic as text | O | O | O |
Upload PDFs/documents | △ (mostly simple conversion) | O | O (deep analysis + summary-based generation) |
Upload audio/video | X | X | O (recording → text → slides) |
Web-search-based creation | △ (plugin) | O (search-specialized) | O (AI search reflects real-time info) |
3. Slide quality comparison
Gamma
- Visual-first: Beautiful layouts that look designer-made
- Excellent automatic image placement
- What’s lacking: Content depth can be shallow, and bullet-style phrasing can feel awkward—often requiring manual edits
Genspark: Genspark
- Fact-first: Generates slides focused on correctness based on searched info
- More about delivering information than design polish
Daglo: Daglo
- Storytelling-first: Excellent at “extract the core message → build a logical flow → apply design”
- Handles long content well: Even with dozens of PDF pages or a lecture recording, it structures it into a clear intro–body–conclusion that matches a presentation narrative
- Design: Clean business templates that often require little to no tweaking before sharing
Conclusion: Which AI tool fits you best?
🇺🇸 If English pitching & design are the priority → Gamma
- For global-target startups, event decks where visuals matter most
🔍 If you need quick summaries of the latest news & trends → Genspark
- When you want to scan fast and turn it into simple slides
🇰🇷 If you’re presenting from your own materials (assignments/reports) → Daglo
- College students: Turn major PDFs or lecture recordings into presentation decks instantly
- Office workers: Build logical reports based on meeting notes, business plan drafts, or internal reports—the kind your boss will actually approve
- Korean document work: When you don’t want to waste time fixing awkward translation-style wording
📝 In short:
Not just “pretty slides,” but if…
- you have lots of source materials like files and recordings, and
- you need a deck that’s substantive and naturally written
then Daglo will be the most productive choice.
Sign up now and see it for yourself! 🙂
Share article